A Demonstration of how McCann supporters 'think'

Travers wrote:

Admin wrote:

South Downs wrote:''Whatever ... in my opinion the fact that such minutiae is still being pored over with prejudice eleven years into that family's continued search for their missing daughter ... must be horribly unique and as far as I am concerned very disturbing.''

From a McCann Moderator who is very disturbing and has never criticized the parents for failing to take care of their children. She is disgusting.

So what searching have the Mccanns done since the morning of May the 4 th ?

Rhetorical question, of course. THEY HAVEN'T.

Bring it up to date. What searching have the McCanns done in the last 12 months?
It's no good them saying that OG is searching for Madeleine, because they aren't. OG are trying to find a culprit, with little success I might add.

Precisely.

After the farce of the woman in purple, whatever next.

' "What came first, Jassi, the chicken or the egg?" I have been told by a veterinarian that the rooster came first. I'm still not sure what she meant. '

I wonder if someone will explain the punchline.

When the McCanns talk about searching, they don't mean actual physical searching. Michael Wright made their role clear in his evidence to the Libel Trial;

They had to lead a campaign to motivate the public to search for Madeleine.

They had no more intention of searching themselves than any other 'leaders' have of doing mundane tasks themselves.

We know the reality of the searching by others employed by them.



It was all show and no substance.

It's quite reassuring that SY agree with me

A post from Drivel!

enyam wrote:

It's quite reassuring that SY agree with me

A post from Drivel!

Ha, I'd never have guessed. Everything is about him. What an arse.

enyam wrote:

It's quite reassuring that SY agree with me

A post from Drivel!

Ha, I'd never have guessed. Everything is about him. What an arse.

The words of a Mccann supporting Moderator.

'I remember a time when I believed an awful lot of the rubbish. It really didn't cross my mind to disbelieve, until I started check for myself.'

Tis a pity she didn't check out the lack of evidence for abduction.

Heres another one.

'Interesting....so you have considered all the evidence....and you have an in depth knowledge of it....and now you se no way the parents are involved...That is precisely my stance...sceptics take note'

This one is definitely slow on the uptake,just trotting out the usual mantra. Evidently,he hasn't worked out that sceptics have sussed him for what he is.

Travers wrote:

enyam wrote:

It's quite reassuring that SY agree with me

A post from Drivel!

Ha, I'd never have guessed. Everything is about him. What an arse.

They crucified the last guy who thought he was perfect.

Here is more of the lunacy supported by pro-McCann Mods


Dear Julia !

Well she is a Pinheiro, isn’t she? She is an in-law of Goncalo de Souse Amaral. Also an in-law (further removed, but close enough), of The Guedes do Amaral bloodline


Once again from Isabel , Duchess of Braganzas Wiki. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabel,_Duchess_of_Braganza


Unfortunately the bloodline chart refuses to be copied or printed, so ....To find these connections:
Go to:
1. Genealogy
2 Ancestry .
3. click on show.

See boxes 3 and 5 The ‘Pinheiros’ are inlaws of the ‘de Sousas’ [Goncalo de Sousa Amaral]


Also see boxes 11 and 22, Guedes do Amaral. Isabel is descended from all these illustrious bloodlines


Lots of names on this illustrious Ancestry list are related to Amaral and his side of the case.. Lots of interesting names there.

Do open it up and have a good look.

Oh, and i forgot to mention, most of them are Knights of St John (Malta).



And Isabel, Queen Pretender to a potential throne of Portugal is descended from all these interesting names.

I do hope whoever wrote that is receiving treatment for what appears to be a severe mental disorder.

In my opinion you are insidiously introducing misinformation to the forum in many of your posts.

Quote
If they were M & S ones, no they weren't. They don't sell them any more but when they did they had short sleeves; oh, and the smallest size was 6 years of age.

I will be deleting any future posts which I consider to be against forum rules .....

A McCann moderator in action, who will remove material bot suiting her agenda/mantra.

That is the nub of it.

The latest quip by the copy and paste specialist McCann moderator alludes to the dogs alerting to halitosis. Whether this is blind ignorance or a jest is open to interpretation.

It could of course leave a bad taste in your mouth.

Admin wrote:The latest quip by the copy and paste specialist McCann moderator alludes to the dogs alerting to halitosis. Whether this is blind ignorance or a jest is open to interpretation.

It could of course leave a bad taste in your mouth.

Getting on towards 11yrs and the dogs still cause consternation,still its recognized that they did alert to something.

Their scientific acumen is not exactly impressive.Copy and pasting is not a sign of intellect.

Apparently John Lamberton is upset that some posters on the jf are being insulted by some on here, and who post on there as well. Has he forgotten that those very same McCann supporters post on hate sites, as well as the jf, and insult sceptics, and some have on stm and jatyk insulted Lamberton as well, calling it a hate forum. Ther is now a thread on the issue. Also, some would benefit by looking up Lamberton's history on the net as well and his activities.

It's OK when supporters do it cos us sceptics are only scum. A different matter when the boot's on t'other foot and they're the ones under fire.
Seeing as we're all only inventions of our own imagination, can't see that it matters overly much.

It seems that the e-fits are causing the supporter group as much concern as those darned dogs.
The desperation to discredit them is pathetic, but hilarious to behold.

Travers wrote:It seems that the e-fits are causing the supporter group as much concern as those darned dogs.
The desperation to discredit them is pathetic, but hilarious  to behold.  

Always interesting to see the main areas of concern for them, instructions must be to diss them.

If we could just get them onto the last photo as well they'd be apoplectic .

Eleanor getting very wound up today.

From the UKJF.

Quote from: ShiningInLuz on Today at 09:54:57 AM

'Madeleine went missing in Portugal but the McCanns have done nothing, for years, to try to win the hearts and minds of the Portuguese people.

Then there is Fortress Rothley. I can understand why they cut all incoming lines of communication, but that also shuts out a few people who could progress the search for Madeleine.

It still comes across as Kate and Gerry PR, not one of taking the tough choices to find Madeleine.'



REPLY FROM THE POSTER CALLED 'SADIE'



IMO
They had a team of volunteers around them to help them.

100 volunteers, strangers who had come forward to help ... and some were NOT supporters; they were effectively spies and disrupters. They had sneaked in unnoticed and were actively preventing worthwhile information from getting thru IMO.
................


I came back from an amazing investigative trip to PT with some outstanding information .... stuff that no-one, prior to that, had even thought of looking at ... and which I believe that OG are still looking at.

I tried to pass it on to this volunteer team and some woman on the phone REFUSED to take it,. Point blank she refused it, despite it being of significant importance and very obviously so. She was not a supporter, but a spy, anxious IMO to refuse any proper info getting thru. Who put her there?


Since then she has appeared on here, as a member. She showed herself as an avid detractor from the Mccanns.


With her unusual name and style I immediately realised just who she was and I challenged her. She rapidly left and her name has been removed from the members list. No record of her anywhere that I can find any more


I wonder why her forum record has been obliterated?

I wonder how much damage she caused the Mccanns and the search for Madeleine?

I wonder who thought to put her in that group, with how many others? The search for Madeleine was being deliberately sabotaged IMO.


It seems to me that there has been a deliberate and organised attempt, on many fronts, to destroy The Mccanns and their search
Extremely SINISTER in my opinion.

« Last Edit: Today at 01:45:47 PM by sadie » ''


HOW ON EARTH CAN THIS UNSUBSTANTIATED 'MATERIAL' BE ALLOWED?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10214.150