Heriberto Janosch González, self declared 'criminologist'

I've rarely seen so much bollox typed by one individual.

Then the McCann supporters love him.

I can't imagine why.


http://espacioexterior.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-abduction-of-madeleine-mccann-my.html

I wonder what notice the police take of this amateur nobody.

Perhaps it would help if he stopped typing his fantasies, and started with proven facts.

One thing I've never seen really explained is why use the window when there was a perfectly operational patio door already unlocked and open.

enyam wrote:One thing I've never seen really explained is why use the window when there was a perfectly operational patio door already unlocked and open.

Heriberto merely uses the information that fits his theories, regardless of whether it is coherent.

He has recently pruned his blog and left just one brief piece on there. I wonder why?

Grom wrote:He has recently pruned his blog and left just one brief piece on there. I wonder why?

Not too hard to imagine why.

Hairyberko appears to have gone quiet in recent times, and Nesslings blogs have disappeared.
Are the events connected?

I wondered how long Nessling's blog would survive. My question is; can you get someone else's wordpress blog deleted or can only the blog owner delete it?

Grom wrote:I wondered how long Nessling's blog would survive. My question is; can you get someone else's wordpress blog deleted or can only the blog owner delete it?

I should think any provider can get stuff removed at will if it is likely to reflect badly on the provider.

Grom wrote:I wondered how long Nessling's blog would survive. My question is; can you get someone else's wordpress blog deleted or can only the blog owner delete it?

Now that I do not know, but if the blogs did not contain any inflammatory or libel, then Nessling would be the one to have removed them. However, IMO, many of his blogs were libelous and inflammatory and he told multiple lies.

I hear his good mate has disowned him, Adrian Upshon.

I did here a rumour that instructions from the Facebook site to the supporters was to ignore and delete any references to Nessling.

Admin wrote:

Grom wrote:I wondered how long Nessling's blog would survive. My question is; can you get someone else's wordpress blog deleted or can only the blog owner delete it?

Now that I do not know, but if the blogs did not contain any inflammatory or libel, then Nessling would be the one to have removed them. However, IMO, many of his blogs were libelous and inflammatory and he told multiple lies.

I hear his good mate has disowned him, Adrian Upshon.

I did here a rumour that instructions from the Facebook site to the supporters was to ignore and delete any references to Nessling.

I can confirm that. Upshon has made comments as regards his friendship with Nessling.

Admin wrote:I've rarely seen so much bollox typed by one individual.

Then the McCann supporters love him.

I can't imagine why.


http://espacioexterior.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-abduction-of-madeleine-mccann-my.html

I wonder what notice the police take of this amateur nobody.

Perhaps it would help if he stopped typing his fantasies, and started with proven facts.

The thing is, he isn't an amateur. He is on the staff at the criminology department in Madrid.
That does not detract from the fact that what he says is total bollocks, and in the case of him ''woman in purple'' scoop, dangerous bollocks, which basically accused a completely innocent woman and exposed her to god knows what potential danger from deranged Maddie watchers

Watcher wrote:

Admin wrote:I've rarely seen so much bollox typed by one individual.

Then the McCann supporters love him.

I can't imagine why.


http://espacioexterior.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-abduction-of-madeleine-mccann-my.html

I wonder what notice the police take of this amateur nobody.

Perhaps it would help if he stopped typing his fantasies, and started with proven facts.

The thing is, he isn't an amateur. He is on the staff at the criminology department in Madrid.
That does not detract from the fact that what he says is total bollocks, and in the case of him ''woman in purple'' scoop, dangerous bollocks, which basically accused a completely innocent woman and exposed her to god knows what potential danger from deranged Maddie watchers

Have you found any other cases Heriberto has worked on Watcher ?

Evidently, given his stance on the case as 100% abduction and his ties to certain people, including Nessling, which I already knew about, prior to Nesslings's conviction, Heriberto's behaviour is appalling. No wonder much of his opinions on the case have disappeared too.

Has he even apologized to the lady involved ?

He hasn't commented on the jf recently since Nessling's conviction.

Admin wrote:

Watcher wrote:

Admin wrote:I've rarely seen so much bollox typed by one individual.

Then the McCann supporters love him.

I can't imagine why.


http://espacioexterior.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-abduction-of-madeleine-mccann-my.html

I wonder what notice the police take of this amateur nobody.

Perhaps it would help if he stopped typing his fantasies, and started with proven facts.

The thing is, he isn't an amateur. He is on the staff at the criminology department in Madrid.
That does not detract from the fact that what he says is total bollocks, and in the case of him ''woman in purple'' scoop, dangerous bollocks, which basically accused a completely innocent woman and exposed her to god knows what potential danger from deranged Maddie watchers

Have you found any other cases Heriberto has worked on Watcher ?

Evidently, given his stance on the case as 100% abduction and his ties to certain people, including Nessling, which I already knew about, prior to Nesslings's conviction, Heriberto's behaviour is appalling. No wonder much of his opinions on the case have disappeared too.

Has he even apologized to the lady involved ?

He hasn't commented on the jf recently since Nessling's conviction.

Shining in luz blog says he's given up on the McCann case.

Maybe he's finally realised he's been backing the wrong horse

Admin wrote:

Watcher wrote:

Admin wrote:I've rarely seen so much bollox typed by one individual.

Then the McCann supporters love him.

I can't imagine why.


http://espacioexterior.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-abduction-of-madeleine-mccann-my.html

I wonder what notice the police take of this amateur nobody.

Perhaps it would help if he stopped typing his fantasies, and started with proven facts.

The thing is, he isn't an amateur. He is on the staff at the criminology department in Madrid.
That does not detract from the fact that what he says is total bollocks, and in the case of him ''woman in purple'' scoop, dangerous bollocks, which basically accused a completely innocent woman and exposed her to god knows what potential danger from deranged Maddie watchers

Have you found any other cases Heriberto has worked on Watcher ?

Evidently, given his stance on the case as 100% abduction and his ties to certain people, including Nessling, which I already knew about, prior to Nesslings's conviction, Heriberto's behaviour is appalling. No wonder much of his opinions on the case have disappeared too.

Has he even apologized to the lady involved ?

He hasn't commented on the jf recently since Nessling's conviction.

I haven't found any record of him in relation to other cases, but in fairness I haven't particularly gone looking. Frankly, I think his "woman in purple" cock up has finished him off. Poor research and irresponsible journalism will do that to you.

enyam wrote:

Admin wrote:

Watcher wrote:

Admin wrote:I've rarely seen so much bollox typed by one individual.

Then the McCann supporters love him.

I can't imagine why.


http://espacioexterior.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-abduction-of-madeleine-mccann-my.html

I wonder what notice the police take of this amateur nobody.

Perhaps it would help if he stopped typing his fantasies, and started with proven facts.

The thing is, he isn't an amateur. He is on the staff at the criminology department in Madrid.
That does not detract from the fact that what he says is total bollocks, and in the case of him ''woman in purple'' scoop, dangerous bollocks, which basically accused a completely innocent woman and exposed her to god knows what potential danger from deranged Maddie watchers

Have you found any other cases Heriberto has worked on Watcher ?

Evidently, given his stance on the case as 100% abduction and his ties to certain people, including Nessling, which I already knew about, prior to Nesslings's conviction, Heriberto's behaviour is appalling. No wonder much of his opinions on the case have disappeared too.

Has he even apologized to the lady involved ?

He hasn't commented on the jf recently since Nessling's conviction.

Shining in luz blog says he's given up on the McCann case.

Now the question is why, apart from the fact he clearly doesn't have a clue what actually happened, anymore than the rest of us. All we have is our theories.

Watcher wrote:

Admin wrote:

Watcher wrote:

Admin wrote:I've rarely seen so much bollox typed by one individual.

Then the McCann supporters love him.

I can't imagine why.


http://espacioexterior.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-abduction-of-madeleine-mccann-my.html

I wonder what notice the police take of this amateur nobody.

Perhaps it would help if he stopped typing his fantasies, and started with proven facts.

The thing is, he isn't an amateur. He is on the staff at the criminology department in Madrid.
That does not detract from the fact that what he says is total bollocks, and in the case of him ''woman in purple'' scoop, dangerous bollocks, which basically accused a completely innocent woman and exposed her to god knows what potential danger from deranged Maddie watchers

Have you found any other cases Heriberto has worked on Watcher ?

Evidently, given his stance on the case as 100% abduction and his ties to certain people, including Nessling, which I already knew about, prior to Nesslings's conviction, Heriberto's behaviour is appalling. No wonder much of his opinions on the case have disappeared too.

Has he even apologized to the lady involved ?

He hasn't commented on the jf recently since Nessling's conviction.

I haven't found any record of him in relation to other cases, but in fairness I haven't particularly gone looking. Frankly, I think his "woman in purple" cock up has finished him off. Poor research and irresponsible journalism will do that to you.

I have looked him up, and the only references available on him and others debunking U.F.O. sightings, and a claim he worked for the C.I.A.

Admin wrote:

Watcher wrote:

Admin wrote:

Watcher wrote:

Admin wrote:I've rarely seen so much bollox typed by one individual.

Then the McCann supporters love him.

I can't imagine why.


http://espacioexterior.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-abduction-of-madeleine-mccann-my.html

I wonder what notice the police take of this amateur nobody.

Perhaps it would help if he stopped typing his fantasies, and started with proven facts.

The thing is, he isn't an amateur. He is on the staff at the criminology department in Madrid.
That does not detract from the fact that what he says is total bollocks, and in the case of him ''woman in purple'' scoop, dangerous bollocks, which basically accused a completely innocent woman and exposed her to god knows what potential danger from deranged Maddie watchers

Have you found any other cases Heriberto has worked on Watcher ?

Evidently, given his stance on the case as 100% abduction and his ties to certain people, including Nessling, which I already knew about, prior to Nesslings's conviction, Heriberto's behaviour is appalling. No wonder much of his opinions on the case have disappeared too.

Has he even apologized to the lady involved ?

He hasn't commented on the jf recently since Nessling's conviction.

I haven't found any record of him in relation to other cases, but in fairness I haven't particularly gone looking. Frankly, I think his "woman in purple" cock up has finished him off. Poor research and irresponsible journalism will do that to you.

I have looked him up, and the only references available on him and others debunking U.F.O. sightings, and a claim he worked for the C.I.A.

One of the Really Big Boys then to parrotphrase the Cross Eyed Lion ?