THE MCCANN CASE

Go down

THE MCCANN CASE

Post by Admin2 on Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:44 am

This is a test page.

avatar
Admin2
Admin

Posts : 397
Join date : 2017-10-10

View user profile http://thediscussionforum.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: THE MCCANN CASE

Post by Admin2 on Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:51 am

TEST WORKED.
avatar
Admin2
Admin

Posts : 397
Join date : 2017-10-10

View user profile http://thediscussionforum.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Contradictions

Post by pathfinder73 on Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:26 pm

I will use it as a random test post on contradictions.

Matt revealed truth from PJ pressure as G-Unit mentioned on another thread. In that interview a lot came out e.g. Kate's early checking/alarm time. The first group timeline is a farce and it suggests some were trying to cover  tracks. Gerry left just after 9 but didn't return till 9:20 then what was he doing? The last witness to see Maddy and he can't account for his time away. Of course he is a prime suspect being the last witness. The Smithman sighting was indeed after Kate's alarm. If the alarm time is put back it rules somebody out. He can't be in two places at once? Yes he can if the TIME has changed. We're talking minutes here - that's all that was required for a nearby sighting.

They thought it was safe to leave the children sleeping in the apartments but the McCanns claim Maddy was awake crying so they leave them again in an unlocked apartment. Who believes that BS!  Fiona was shocked when she found out it was unlocked on Thursday night just before Madeleine was reported to be missing (she said she knew on previous nights it has been locked and they had been using the front key door) and she is one of Kate's closest friends. It had to be unlocked on Thursday for anyone to enter and take her away. Now everyone's a suspect!

The reason it was unlocked at 9:30 for Matt is simply because it was meant to be Kate's check. Think about that one as it connects to the first LONG check. What would Kate had found at 9:30? Do you think Madeleine would be there or would it be whooshing curtains?

The crying night changed from Tue to Wed to set up the abductor/mysterious stain - Gerry said David went there alone on Wed to check on the children which I find most interesting (Gerry didn't need to reveal this which David denied unless there's a good reason!) because of the many contradictions from his visit at normal bath time (6:30 to 7pm) on Thur 3 May.

Pamela Fenn heard crying on Tue and the McCanns claim it was Wed (Rachael also contradicts them). The cleaner saw a cot in the parents bedroom on Wed which once again connects to something happened on Tue night.  The series of rapid phone activity on Kate's mobile (Tue) before Maddy crying was reported.

Many witnesses contradict the McCanns.

pathfinder73

Posts : 51
Join date : 2017-10-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: THE MCCANN CASE

Post by Grom on Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:36 pm

When interviewed on 9th May Najoua Chekaya  couldn't recall seeing Kate at the table when she was there between 21.30 and 21.50 on 1st. She was re-interviewed on 20th June but couldn't identify who was missing that night, despite being shown photographs. It later transpired that Russell stayed home that night, but Jane didn't talk about that when she mentioned the quiz in her 10th May statement. She was more intent on pointing the finger at two 'unknown' couples;

on one night (she thinks it was Tuesday, 1 May) there were two couples, supposedly English, that dined in the Tapas restaurant. After [their meal] they left......
She never saw those couples before nor since that day. She does not know if they were Mark Warner clients.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE-TANNER-10MAY.htm

Grom

Posts : 153
Join date : 2017-10-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: THE MCCANN CASE

Post by Admin2 on Wed Oct 25, 2017 10:00 am

The second rate psychologist and nurse has reappeared in forum land.

More de-bunking, you might say.
avatar
Admin2
Admin

Posts : 397
Join date : 2017-10-10

View user profile http://thediscussionforum.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: THE MCCANN CASE

Post by Grom on Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:09 pm

You might like what this man says, Admin;

http://www.vernoncoleman.com/main.htm

Look in Miscellany scroll down 3/4 of the page to 'Are the McCanns guilty of neglect?'

Grom

Posts : 153
Join date : 2017-10-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: THE MCCANN CASE

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum